Why the courtyards of historical palaces should not be roofed in

Authors

  • Javier Pérez Gil Department of Theory of Architecture and Architectural Design University of Valladolid, Spain
  • Rodrigo Almonacid Department of Theory of Architecture and Architectural Design University of Valladolid, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-9494/17307

Keywords:

historical palaces, courtyard, conservation, architectural theory, roofs

Abstract

There is a trend to roof over the courtyards of historical palaces and similar great buildings with an eye to conservation or to expanding their range of functions. This tendency is being popularized by major architects and barely a voice is raised against it. However, from the viewpoint of theory and heritage, such actions are not to be recommended. In line with some international documents on cultural heritage, several architectural, perceptual and functional arguments show that, in order to preserve the cultural authenticity of courtyards, it would be advisable to avoid covering them. A courtyard is by definition an open space. Covering it, even with an apparently harmless glazed roof, radically affects its architectural essence and how it is experienced. Hence, such projects should not be accepted in a generalized and uncritical manner. It is best for courtyards to be left as courtyards, not as rooms with skylights.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-20

How to Cite

Pérez Gil, J., & Almonacid, R. (2022). Why the courtyards of historical palaces should not be roofed in. Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage, 22(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-9494/17307

Issue

Section

Articles